If I look at the Act-Utilitarianism, it looks at the consequences of a particular ACT, if greatest happiness for greatest number then that act is RIGHT also refers to the concept as the moral side of democracy. Based on this I think the most utilitarian option is E because the statement refers to more amount for the total good and it is not concerned with individual needs. The other options are more looking at an individual’s needs like ‘who cares’ or this is good because it benefits me.
I would like to believe that most of us would agree with option E based on the emotions highlighted in this statement and that the world would be a better place if all of us including our leaders applied or contributed to a safer environment for the children. And I say our leaders because every day you read about how corruption is crippling our fiscus.
I chose option E from the onset because it sounded right and it is the right thing to do to achieve maximum happiness.
I also refer you to https://www.slideshare.net/aquinas_rs/overview-utilitarianism
Negative utilitarianism: To prevent the greatest amount of suffering for the greatest number.
Option is E morally correct and it allows for maximum good in the world. Children dying for the sake of individual needs can never justify the acts of corruptions.